Under the headline "Slaughter in Syria," ABC World News declared that people were being killed in Syria since President Trump withdrew U.S. troops. The news featured a clip of machine guns being fired, blast and flashes of light in the night, and what appears to be a complete and horrible killing in Syria. ABC continued their on-going biased attempts to attack the President publically with their huge news, viewer base. The problem...ABC news lied.
Within a few hours of the post, several other news outlets noted that the dreadful attack on the Syrian people looked familiar. It not only looked familiar, but it was also actually the footage of the Knob Creek Gun Range's annual machine gun shoot. The shoot, described by many people on social media, is a wonderful opportunity for the public to witness fully automatic weapons fire and see some explosions. The event is conducted every two years under strict supervision and for the public enjoyment - think the equivalent of an air show or tank demonstration. Consequently, no Syrians were killed by the presentation. It should also be noted that while no Syrians were murdered, the fact is that during the demonstration, from 2017, by the way, nobody suffered from the "fury of the Turkish attack" - credit 10-13-2019 ABC World News Tonight, and 10-14-2019 ABC Good Morning America.
By mid-Monday evening, the world was hearing the apologies of ABC. They expressed how they were sorry for the mistake, took down the footage, and they posted, "We regret the error." No, ABC News, I do not think you "regret" anything. ABC News is a worldwide, multi-billion dollar news and media company with hundreds to thousands of employees. They are educated, trained professionals in the field of communication and news reporting. These employees know the difference between "News," "Opinions," and outright "Lies," essentially equalling "Fake News." An apology to the President, to the American people, and to the world that watches ABC is not enough. Yes, we have freedom of the press, and it is a beautiful gift here in the United States, but that freedom does not give you the right to Lie and create Fake News. What you have done is deceptive, dishonest, and deplorable.
If you want to hate the President and his policies, okay...that's your right. If you're going to voice your opinion about it, fine...create a blog like this one, or at least list a view in the "Opinion" section of your news. But if you want to create Fake News and Lies, then you deserve the onslaught you've seen on social media. In truth, you most likely deserve a review of your license through the FCC at a minimum. Shame on you for taking a responsibility to provide unbiased news! The one positive about all of this fiasco is that you, ABC World News, has once again proven why Americans overall have more faith in President Trump. When the President calls you "Fake News," you have given one more example to support his statement.
Oct 15, 2019
Oct 7, 2019
Attacks on Trump Continue
If you are like me, then you were extremely frustrated this morning when the announcement came about President Trump's taxes. A judge, appointed by Bill Clinton, ruled that Trump has to turn over his tax returns to a New York DA. Consequently, that DA is another Democrat. The order covers taxes back to 2011. The IRS has already stated that Democrats are trying to weaponize Trump's tax returns. I have to say, I agree with the IRS and many other assessments. It merely seems like the Democrats are trying to attack Trump on any point they can muster up even down to his tax returns.
Naturally, Trump's lawyers are already in the process of filing an appeal to the recent "Democrat Motivated" move to obtain tax returns. Democrat's failed in Congress to get the returns, so they have targetted two states - New York and California. California actually passed an unconstitutional law that requires a Presidential candidate to release his tax returns. Notice what I said there by the way, "Unconstitutional." Nowhere in any law is a presidential candidate, much less a candidate for any office, required to release his or her tax returns. Democrats simply hope to find some error, some mistake, or maybe the fact is that Trump had so many business deductions he paid low taxes.
Consider this for a moment - what if the Democrats do get Trump's returns? Maybe he did pay low taxes, or there is some other mistake in those tax documents. What does it all mean? It's simple; it means that there was a failure and someone failed? When you're a billionaire, you usually don't sit down at the table and complete your tax returns on April 14 and run to the post office and get them off to the IRS. When you are a billionaire, you have tax information all year long. Before Trump was President, that is precisely what he was doing - running businesses. So, he was not the guy sweating at 7:15 p.m. on April 14, trying to finish his taxes. So if there is a mistake in Trump's taxes, who do you think is to blame? Well, here's a list for you:
1. The office staff handling the return information such as deductions, cost, and income.
2. The accounting firm handling Trump's taxes would be the first to make a mistake.
3. The state income tax in New York or whatever state the business files in would be liable for an error they failed to catch.
4. The IRS - they reviewed, stamped, and accepted the returns. If they had a problem with them, then they would initiate a review or audit - otherwise, they are accepted and not even considered after seven years.
Even if by some Democrat, Magical Blessing, Democrats do obtain Trump's tax returns, it is highly unlikely that any mistake made would be directly attributed to him. He pays people to handle this daily, and those people are professionals with liability insurance - yes, insurance to cover if THEY make a mistake. Whether you like Trump or not, he is a billionaire, and like others in business and money, he has precautions in place. Again, he is simply not the guy sitting at the table on April 14, trying to get that envelop to the post office. Any review of Trump's taxes and any mistakes which may be found is ultimately going to show that someone made a mistake. It will show that either an employee, accountant, state employee, or a federal employee made that mistake. It is not going to be an error that Trump personally made so the Democrats could plaster it all over their campaign posters. I guess you do have to applaud the Democrats for trying...after all, none of their other lies about Trump are being bought by the American people.
Sep 25, 2019
Congressional Democrats Continue to Get NOTHING and Do NOTHING
There is an ancient saying... "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me," and the Democrats simply do not get it. They have collectively allowed, if not outright encouraged, President Trump to make them look like fools on several occasions. Now the Democrats have decided to continue this foolish path with impeachment proceedings.
Consider the Democrat Machine's history to this point:
1. They yelled before Trump could even be sworn in that he had ties to Russia and was conducting business with Russia. They yelled this even as he was stepping down from his companies to work as the President, but they still yelled about his worldwide business and NOTHING came from it.
2. They conjured up a porn star to say she was paid to keep her mouth shut about sexual relationships with Trump. The case was dismissed, and in fact, the judge ruled that the porn star and her lawyer had to pay Trump's legal fees. While we would like to say NOTHING came of this, the fact is Trump's legal costs were covered - finally, the Democrats had some success! Later the lawyer was arrested, and it has since been reported in some circles that the porn star was lying.
3. They attempted to block Trump's Supreme Court Nomination by having a woman come up to testify - you know because she is so brave now 30 years later - about a sexual encounter where the future judge forced himself on her in a sexual nature - 30 years ago, at a party, located someplace, somewhere, on some date, that nobody could seem to remember the exact details including this woman. The woman was surprisingly able to pay off her new beach home, disappeared after testifying and was hailed as a "Hero" by Democrats - not sure what their definition of a hero is at this point BTW. In the end, there was NOTHING for them to use. Even now, there are reports it was all a lie -you know, from someday, somewhere, someplace, at some point in the past - but who the heck knows for sure!
4. They then continued their Russia Collusion claims and tried to show how the President allegedly cooperated with Russia to work on winning the elections. Naturally, they never mentioned the various ties that Hillary Clinton had to Russia - not as a businesswoman, but as the Secretary of State of the United States, a former member of Congress, and a former first lady of the United States - no, somehow all of that was ignored only to have a report that showed Trump had NOTHING to do with Russia during the elections.
5. Then the Democrats attempted to use their power in Congress to get Trump's tax returns. It was a move that even the IRS said was politically motivated when they said that they would not allow a citizen's tax returns to be "weaponized." They filed and pushed, and in the end, Democrats got NOTHING to this day.
6. Democrats then turned to states and local cities where they had friends and pushed to get rules to where President Trump had to release his tax returns to them or in some places he could not be on the ballot without releasing his tax returns. Federal courts continue to strike that purely political move down and again the Democrats get NOTHING.
7. Now Democrats are yelling for impeachment. They are not only citing the old, disproven information again - cause apparently, they do not understand when you have NOTHING that you have "NOTHING." So impeachment is going to proceed with full Democrat support and what are they going to get? NOTHING. The push will not make it through the Senate, and once again Democrats will be left with egg on their face for their futile, waste of time.
While it is easy to dismiss and laugh at all the complete failures of the Democrat Party to attack Trump, it equally disturbing. Since before Trump took office, Democrats have worked, tried to pull strings, pushed for outside help, and done everything in their power to discredit and now they are pushing to remove the lawfully elected President of the United States. They want to remove him, not because he has done anything illegal or wrong, but because they don't like him. The Democrat dislike for the President is so severe for one reason and one reason only - he is doing precisely what he said he would do for the nation, and he can not be bought. They can not walk into the President's office and buy him. Democrats simply do not like that.
They have attacked the President and his supporters and gotten NOTHING.
They have slandered the President and his supporters and gotten NOTHING.
They have used their positions to attack the President and his supporters and got NOTHING.
They have used their supporters and friends to attack the President and their supporters, and they have gotten NOTHING.
The sad thing is we have allowed the Democrats in Congress to receive a yearly salary for nearly four years now to do NOTHING except attack a President with baseless lies and false accusations. The people in those districts represented by Democrats should think long and hard the next time they go to the polls. While these Democrats have focussed on Trump, they have completed neglected the people who elected them, and that is the ultimate shame in all this fiasco.
Consider the Democrat Machine's history to this point:
1. They yelled before Trump could even be sworn in that he had ties to Russia and was conducting business with Russia. They yelled this even as he was stepping down from his companies to work as the President, but they still yelled about his worldwide business and NOTHING came from it.
2. They conjured up a porn star to say she was paid to keep her mouth shut about sexual relationships with Trump. The case was dismissed, and in fact, the judge ruled that the porn star and her lawyer had to pay Trump's legal fees. While we would like to say NOTHING came of this, the fact is Trump's legal costs were covered - finally, the Democrats had some success! Later the lawyer was arrested, and it has since been reported in some circles that the porn star was lying.
3. They attempted to block Trump's Supreme Court Nomination by having a woman come up to testify - you know because she is so brave now 30 years later - about a sexual encounter where the future judge forced himself on her in a sexual nature - 30 years ago, at a party, located someplace, somewhere, on some date, that nobody could seem to remember the exact details including this woman. The woman was surprisingly able to pay off her new beach home, disappeared after testifying and was hailed as a "Hero" by Democrats - not sure what their definition of a hero is at this point BTW. In the end, there was NOTHING for them to use. Even now, there are reports it was all a lie -you know, from someday, somewhere, someplace, at some point in the past - but who the heck knows for sure!
4. They then continued their Russia Collusion claims and tried to show how the President allegedly cooperated with Russia to work on winning the elections. Naturally, they never mentioned the various ties that Hillary Clinton had to Russia - not as a businesswoman, but as the Secretary of State of the United States, a former member of Congress, and a former first lady of the United States - no, somehow all of that was ignored only to have a report that showed Trump had NOTHING to do with Russia during the elections.
5. Then the Democrats attempted to use their power in Congress to get Trump's tax returns. It was a move that even the IRS said was politically motivated when they said that they would not allow a citizen's tax returns to be "weaponized." They filed and pushed, and in the end, Democrats got NOTHING to this day.
6. Democrats then turned to states and local cities where they had friends and pushed to get rules to where President Trump had to release his tax returns to them or in some places he could not be on the ballot without releasing his tax returns. Federal courts continue to strike that purely political move down and again the Democrats get NOTHING.
7. Now Democrats are yelling for impeachment. They are not only citing the old, disproven information again - cause apparently, they do not understand when you have NOTHING that you have "NOTHING." So impeachment is going to proceed with full Democrat support and what are they going to get? NOTHING. The push will not make it through the Senate, and once again Democrats will be left with egg on their face for their futile, waste of time.
While it is easy to dismiss and laugh at all the complete failures of the Democrat Party to attack Trump, it equally disturbing. Since before Trump took office, Democrats have worked, tried to pull strings, pushed for outside help, and done everything in their power to discredit and now they are pushing to remove the lawfully elected President of the United States. They want to remove him, not because he has done anything illegal or wrong, but because they don't like him. The Democrat dislike for the President is so severe for one reason and one reason only - he is doing precisely what he said he would do for the nation, and he can not be bought. They can not walk into the President's office and buy him. Democrats simply do not like that.
They have attacked the President and his supporters and gotten NOTHING.
They have slandered the President and his supporters and gotten NOTHING.
They have used their positions to attack the President and his supporters and got NOTHING.
They have used their supporters and friends to attack the President and their supporters, and they have gotten NOTHING.
The sad thing is we have allowed the Democrats in Congress to receive a yearly salary for nearly four years now to do NOTHING except attack a President with baseless lies and false accusations. The people in those districts represented by Democrats should think long and hard the next time they go to the polls. While these Democrats have focussed on Trump, they have completed neglected the people who elected them, and that is the ultimate shame in all this fiasco.
Sep 13, 2019
Beto O'Rourke Masters "Flip-Flop Magic"
Beto O’Rourke shared his "Flip-Flop Magic" with America last night. You know the type of magic that can have a person saying one thing one day and the complete opposite the next day? Yeah, that's "Flip-Flop Magic."
In 2018, Beto sounded like the Democrats of old - you know the ones with the"Put a man on the moon," and "We'll die with our guns in our hands" type of Democrat that many of us grew up around. These Democrats often were in close alignment with Republicans on many issues. It made it easy for us to all come to the table, discuss issues and compromise, develop policies, and move America forward. In those glory days- that's what I'll call them - of our Democrat friends, these words by Beto should not only sound familiar, but they should stir you:
Beto actually looks like an American there, doesn't he? Well, that all changed last night. Whether Beto was playing to a specific audience, trying to sound tough on guns, or just showing off his "Flip-Flop Magic" abilities, he suddenly seemed like a Socialist Dictator from some third world country trying to impress himself and elevate himself as the top ruler, lawgiver, and enforcer for the entire nation. Beto's "Flip-Flop Magic" became glaringly apparent as he told a story about children being killed by AR-15's and then made the following statement:
No, you are not reading that wrong. "Flip-Flop Magic" Beto O'Rourke has gone from respecting law-abiding gun owners to outright screaming curse words and telling America on live television that if elected, he will - note this is not he might, he might ask you, he might ask you to give it up - no, he is "GOING TO TAKE YOUR AR-15, YOUR AK-47". This is not a debate, it's not a discussion, it's not a "We'll negotiate." No, this is an outright declaration that if elected President of the United States, he will throw the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights out the window and take your guns.
To my Democrat friends - is this the type of candidate you want to support? Do you want someone who will take your guns? Maybe you don't have an AR-15 or an AK-47. Perhaps you just have a hunting rifle or a handgun or a shotgun. I mean surely he did not mean he would take those too, did he? I mean if a person will take one gun away from you, what would stop him from taking another firearm away from you? What would stop him from suddenly deciding that since we don't need the Second Amendment, we really don't need the First, Third, Fourth and so on - after all, wouldn't "illegal search and seizure" need to be tossed out too so that he could take your guns? Wouldn't the "freedom of speech" need to be removed so he could keep you silent about his actions? Do you really think Beto would stop with just two types of guns? Do you think he would finish with only one set of your rights?
Well, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe Beto doesn't have that "Flip-Flop Magic" going. Perhaps he is just blowing smoke as he screams and yells his plans to a cheering audience. I mean, it's not like anyone else in history has ever screamed, yelled, listened to the cheering crowds and then removed guns, rights and eventually lives that interfered with his plans, right? ...
In 2018, Beto sounded like the Democrats of old - you know the ones with the"Put a man on the moon," and "We'll die with our guns in our hands" type of Democrat that many of us grew up around. These Democrats often were in close alignment with Republicans on many issues. It made it easy for us to all come to the table, discuss issues and compromise, develop policies, and move America forward. In those glory days- that's what I'll call them - of our Democrat friends, these words by Beto should not only sound familiar, but they should stir you:
“Well, to be clear, they should have them. If you purchased that AR-15, if you own it, keep it. Continue to use it responsibly,” said O’Rourke. “I think Texas has a real opportunity to lead on this issue right now because we so jealously guard that Second Amendment. We believe in it. We’ll defend it.” - Beto O'Rouke on “The Chad Hasty Show” April 2018
Beto actually looks like an American there, doesn't he? Well, that all changed last night. Whether Beto was playing to a specific audience, trying to sound tough on guns, or just showing off his "Flip-Flop Magic" abilities, he suddenly seemed like a Socialist Dictator from some third world country trying to impress himself and elevate himself as the top ruler, lawgiver, and enforcer for the entire nation. Beto's "Flip-Flop Magic" became glaringly apparent as he told a story about children being killed by AR-15's and then made the following statement:
“Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47.” - Beto O'Rourke Third Democrat Debates 9-2019
No, you are not reading that wrong. "Flip-Flop Magic" Beto O'Rourke has gone from respecting law-abiding gun owners to outright screaming curse words and telling America on live television that if elected, he will - note this is not he might, he might ask you, he might ask you to give it up - no, he is "GOING TO TAKE YOUR AR-15, YOUR AK-47". This is not a debate, it's not a discussion, it's not a "We'll negotiate." No, this is an outright declaration that if elected President of the United States, he will throw the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights out the window and take your guns.
To my Democrat friends - is this the type of candidate you want to support? Do you want someone who will take your guns? Maybe you don't have an AR-15 or an AK-47. Perhaps you just have a hunting rifle or a handgun or a shotgun. I mean surely he did not mean he would take those too, did he? I mean if a person will take one gun away from you, what would stop him from taking another firearm away from you? What would stop him from suddenly deciding that since we don't need the Second Amendment, we really don't need the First, Third, Fourth and so on - after all, wouldn't "illegal search and seizure" need to be tossed out too so that he could take your guns? Wouldn't the "freedom of speech" need to be removed so he could keep you silent about his actions? Do you really think Beto would stop with just two types of guns? Do you think he would finish with only one set of your rights?
Well, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe Beto doesn't have that "Flip-Flop Magic" going. Perhaps he is just blowing smoke as he screams and yells his plans to a cheering audience. I mean, it's not like anyone else in history has ever screamed, yelled, listened to the cheering crowds and then removed guns, rights and eventually lives that interfered with his plans, right? ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






