Republicans selected Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders to give a response to Biden's state of the Union address. Not only did Sanders nail it with her response, but she also brought out key important parts that the current administration seems to ignore.
Governor Sanders pointed out problems of inflation, high gas prices, empty shelves in grocery stores, and bills the average American simply can not pay. The Governor also zeroed in on the current trend of teaching hate to younger generations based on race. While Biden seemed content to act as if everything is excellent for the economy, Sanders boldly pointed out the issues and the failure of the current administration to address those issues.
At one point, Biden outright attacked Republicans stating they wanted to limit programs like Social Security and Medicare, to which Republicans in attendance responded verbally and loudly. Sanders took the charge further in remarks concerning Biden. She stated he is “unfit to serve as commander in chief.” The Republican Governor, sounding more like a Presidential candidate than a Governor, pointed out that Biden's “weakness puts our nation and the world at risk." Once again, Sanders shows how much more in touch with reality she is than the current administration.
Sanders is one of the top rising stars of the Republican Party. She is already breaking records from fundraisers to serving as the first female Governor of Arkansas. Speaker McCarthy called Sanders “a servant-leader of true determination and conviction.” McCarthy could not be more correct as Sanders continues to show the nation what true leadership looks like during a failing Biden administration which appears to lack the ability to know which way is up and which way is down.
Feb 8, 2023
Feb 7, 2023
Biden Says Chinese Spy Balloons Over the U.S. During Trump Administration
Biden now claims that Chinese spy balloons were "undetected" during the Trump
Administration. Does anyone else have an issue with that entire sentece? Let's
be logical here for a minute and think about this entire event. If a spy balloon
is "undected" then doesn't that mean we don't know about it? If we don't know
about it, then how can the Biden Administration claim the spy balloons were over
the U.S. during the Trump Administration?
Done thinking? Well, let's be logical now - the entire statement seems to imply that someone knew the spy balloons were over the U.S. during Trump's Administration, but that someone said nothing and left them listed as "undetected. Here's the reason I have a major problem with this thought process:
1. If the Democrats knew about the spy balloons during the Trump Administration, they would have used that knowledge immediately during the campaign season to attack Trump...they did not. 2. If Trump had known about the spy balloons during his administration, there would have been immediate and swift action - like him or not, you have to admit that he responded from almost the first days in office to any threats against the U.S. - just like any president would and should. 3. How does the U.S. suddenly know that there were spy balloons over the U.S. at any time prior to the one we have been infromed about and they shot down? If they did know about it, why was there no action until now and why do they keep saying the spy balloons were "undetected."
No, like or hate Trump, it really doesn't matter, but the fact is it is doubtful any spy balloons were over the U.S. during the Trump Administration. The informaiton about potential spy balloons would have been too good for any campaign running against Trump to overlook. It only now seems, in someone's mind, logical to say that the balloons were over the U.S. during the Trump Administration because Trump is once again running for President. Sadly, there is a potential nationial threat and instead of focusing on the threat and how to deal with it in the future, the Democrats in the White House only point to point fingers at Republicans. So, the cycle of politics continues as the Democrats play games.
Done thinking? Well, let's be logical now - the entire statement seems to imply that someone knew the spy balloons were over the U.S. during Trump's Administration, but that someone said nothing and left them listed as "undetected. Here's the reason I have a major problem with this thought process:
1. If the Democrats knew about the spy balloons during the Trump Administration, they would have used that knowledge immediately during the campaign season to attack Trump...they did not. 2. If Trump had known about the spy balloons during his administration, there would have been immediate and swift action - like him or not, you have to admit that he responded from almost the first days in office to any threats against the U.S. - just like any president would and should. 3. How does the U.S. suddenly know that there were spy balloons over the U.S. at any time prior to the one we have been infromed about and they shot down? If they did know about it, why was there no action until now and why do they keep saying the spy balloons were "undetected."
No, like or hate Trump, it really doesn't matter, but the fact is it is doubtful any spy balloons were over the U.S. during the Trump Administration. The informaiton about potential spy balloons would have been too good for any campaign running against Trump to overlook. It only now seems, in someone's mind, logical to say that the balloons were over the U.S. during the Trump Administration because Trump is once again running for President. Sadly, there is a potential nationial threat and instead of focusing on the threat and how to deal with it in the future, the Democrats in the White House only point to point fingers at Republicans. So, the cycle of politics continues as the Democrats play games.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)